Re: 2.0.37 broken Config.in

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com)
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 20:22:24 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: initrd redesign (was Re: Partition nightmare Was: Migrating to larger numbers)"
Previous message: david parsons: "Re: Patch 2.2.10 is wrong"
Maybe in reply to: David Dyck: "2.0.37 broken Config.in"

David Dyck wrote:
>
> when running
> make xconfig
> I get the warning
>
> WARNING - broken Config.in! m was not declared!
> WARNING - broken Config.in! CONFIG_ALPHA_BOOK1 was not declared!
>
> is this appropriate for the final stable release of 2.0.x ?

2.0.x is considered dead by the Alpha maintainer, so stick to 2.0.36 or
move up to the next stable version, 2.2.x...

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Werner Almesberger: "Re: initrd redesign (was Re: Partition nightmare Was: Migrating to larger numbers)"
Previous message: david parsons: "Re: Patch 2.2.10 is wrong"
Maybe in reply to: David Dyck: "2.0.37 broken Config.in"