Re: 2.0.37 broken Config.in

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com)
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 23:00:39 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alex Belits: "Re: 2.2.9 -> 2.2.10 lilo err"
Previous message: Michael B. Trausch: "Re: 2.2.9 -> 2.2.10 lilo err"
Maybe in reply to: David Dyck: "2.0.37 broken Config.in"

Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > is this appropriate for the final stable release of 2.0.x ?
> >
> > 2.0.x is considered dead by the Alpha maintainer, so stick to 2.0.36 or
> > move up to the next stable version, 2.2.x...
>
> Any alpha patchkit for .36 ought to work in .37. Nothing deep and magical
> has changed

There exists a patchkit for .35, which should be _almost_ a drop-in
replacement for the current .37 arch/alpha tree.

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alex Belits: "Re: 2.2.9 -> 2.2.10 lilo err"
Previous message: Michael B. Trausch: "Re: 2.2.9 -> 2.2.10 lilo err"
Maybe in reply to: David Dyck: "2.0.37 broken Config.in"