I was thinking of just 1023 files in each. You know, the "privileged"
ports.
Otherwise it would be hard to set permissions on a privileged port before
a program actually opened it 8)
> I have to admit, I think this (conceptually) fits better in the realm of
> devfs. /proc just seems wrong for anything like this, but maybe it's my
> distaste of /proc being polluted for configuration controls showing.
Well see, we have people who dont want procfs *or* devfs. Their solution
would probably be to pollute /dev with a whole new group of maj/min
devices just to hold socket permissions.
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/