Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about devfs)

Steve Dodd (dirk@loth.demon.co.uk)
Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:58:16 +0100


On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 02:06:42PM +0200, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > BTW: the big issue with khttpd is a lack of genericness. Its a single
> > problem single solution piece of code. There are lots and lots of
> > equivalent problems and they all boil own to the same thing.
>
> Not that I completely disagree with you, but I'm just
> curious if you think the same way about knfsd...

I think the difference is that knfsd addresses some 'correctness' issues as
well as performance ones. Though I may well have misunderstood.

-- 
20962296

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/