Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about devfs)
Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Fri, 18 Jun 1999 12:28:49 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I find khttpd is a reasonable idea. I dont know what youre talking about
> > with "lower performance than a user space httpd",
> > http://www.fenrus.demon.nl/ seems to indicate otherwise -- what
> > performance measurements were you looking at? B)
> phhttpd.
You mean phttpd? Has anyone got benchmarks of phttpd vs khttpd?
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/