Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument about
Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Sat, 19 Jun 1999 17:28:20 -0700 (PDT)
On Sat, 19 Jun 1999, Marek Habersack wrote:
> > I've used both an in-kernel http server and boa for an embedded system and
> > boa was much cleaner.
> It's probably a much cleaner solution, yes, but not always faster and more
> efficient both in terms of space and time. But the in-kernel implementation
> is suitable mostly for the embedded systems, IMO.
Exactly. In-kernel http is lower memory profile, simpler, and faster.
All are major issues in embedded systems.
-Dan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/