Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea (was a pointless argument aboutdevfs) Any

John Gardiner Myers (jgmyers@netscape.com)
Sat, 19 Jun 1999 18:21:02 -0700


Alex Belits writes:
> Any examples? All other protocols except NFS (that is already in kernel)
> require heavy processing before sending responses, and won't benefit
> from "generic" solution that really still only benefits one particular
> implementation of one particular protocol.

IMAP, POP. I need both an async sendfile() and an async writev().

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/