Re: Why khttpd is a bad idea

Chris Smith (cd_smith@ou.edu)
Sun, 20 Jun 1999 10:39:57 -0600

> I follow up this discussion a while and don't know why there are so many
> concerns:
>
> 1st: it is a _module_ i.e. It does not bloat the kernel!
> 2nd: it would help embedded stuff very much
> 3rd: when you don't need it, don't load the module

Okay, fine with me. My only concern is that Alan Cox's excellent ideas for
a more general capability might get lost. But I don't want to stop anyone
from writing khttpd -- and I couldn't if I did want to. I'm just giving an
opinion on how useful it will be, in hopes that my thoughts may be useful.

Chris Smith

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/