> > Yes, because Linux prevents operation 2.
> >
> > It would be more logical (but less traditional)
> > to prevent operation 1 instead.
>
> Don't *wham* keep *WHAM* homedirs *WHAM* on root fs *WHAM* *WHAM* *WHAM*
> That's it. And don't let users create anything on critical filesystems.
> Otherwise you are in for much more straightforward fsckups.
?! I thought we are talking about linux here ?!
It should be multiuser fs and should be safe as it is. I know putting
users on different partition is good idea, but it is more like
"additional safeguard". What do you mean with much more
straightforward f*ckups?
Pavel
PS: Filling partition does not work as 5% is reserved for root.
-- I'm really pavel@ucw.cz. Look at http://195.113.31.123/~pavel. Pavel Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature, please!- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/