Re: iToaster in violation of GPL?
Khimenko Victor (khim@sch57.msk.ru)
Sat, 26 Jun 1999 04:39:44 +0400 (MSD)
In <E10xfHx-0005Ii-00@calista.inka.de> Bernd Eckenfels (ecki@lina.inka.de) wrote:
> In article <ABMiPStKvP@khim.sch57.msk.ru> you wrote:
>> This is for the beginning, of course. It's REALLY important check of GPL and
>> we must be ready to go as far as in court :-/ But first thing to do is to
>> ask them gently about Linux, GPL, iToaster and OS sources... And this is duty
>> of Linus I afraid (even he hate such stuff as we all know). Even if Microworks
>> violated copyright of few tens different persons at least with Linux usage...
> Well.. of course there is a lot of non-GPL Code in the kernel...
Sure ? Where ?
P.S. Non-GPL license is Ok, just non-GPL compatible is non-acceptable. Any
license with ability to give binary without sources are not GPL-compatible.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/