I'd be glad to maintain a list of known bugs in the current kernel
versions, however I'm not sure it's a wise idea for me to voulenteer
becuase I don't know very much about the linux kernel's internals. For
example, I don't think I would be able to tell whether two oopses are the
same bug.
I think one of the kernel developers (Alan Cox?) rejected bugzilla for the
kernel. Is a bug database going to be integrated into BitKeeper?
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Greg Lindahl wrote:
> > 2.2.10 is by far less stable than any operating system I have used
> > excuding MacOS. During the past _week_ I have had three oopsen using
> > kernel 2.2.9 and 2.2.10. I have never had an oops before this week with
> > the exception of Linux on platforms where the ports are excusabe immature
> > and on unstable hardware. Once I found a small bug with a friend in 2.0.x
> > that caused an oops but it wasn't anything major. It was fixed
> > immediately.
>
> As far as I know, there is no one maintaining a list of "known oopses
> and bugs" for any version of the kernel. Volunteer?
>
> -- g
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/