Re: IFF_UP vs IFF_RUNNING

George Bonser (grep@shorelink.com)
Fri, 9 Jul 1999 19:12:58 -0700 (PDT)


On Fri, 9 Jul 1999, Jan Kasprzak wrote:

> I think device driver should never set the administrative
> status (IFF_UP) itself, but can set the operative status (IFF_RUNNING),
> if the line become OK (e.g. it gets correct LCP or keepalive packet).
>
> -Yenya

I agree. IFF_RUNNING is not currently used by any of the low level network
drivers AFAIK but it SHOULD be for such things as channel bonding (like
Cisco EtherChannel).

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/