Re: [RFC] - Some notions that I would like comments on

Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Mon, 12 Jul 1999 23:14:58 +0100 (BST)


Hi,

On Mon, 12 Jul 1999 15:34:54 -0300, Jeff Dike <jdike@karaya.com> said:

>> No, VM tricks can be very expensive (especially with threaded programs
>> on SMP, where every VM update has to involve a cross-CPU interrupt to
>> invalidate TLB caches on other CPUs).

> Are there any references floating around about interprocessor communication
> and its costs?

Not really --- just look up the linux-kernel archives. :)

>> > A pseudo-filesystem for exposing internal process state
>> Ooh, like /proc fs?

> Should my sarcasm detector be firing here :-) /proc contains stuff
> that the kernel maintains. I was referring to very
> application-specific stuff like what function gcc is currently
> compiling or make's dependency tree and where it is in updating it.

No, I'm serious. /proc is extensible by design. Don't do another
filesystem when you can extend procfs.

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/