Sounds fine with me. The current behaviour isn't useful anyway.
> It has taken almost a year and
> my patch has always bounced off on discussions where NO
> code for any of the other proposals has shown up.
My comment wasn't against your patch but on a suggestion (or, rather,
on such suggestions in general) for putting a lot of OOM policy into
the kernel. I tried to show that there can be many useful policies
which are hard to implement in the kernel, even if bloat is not an
issue. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough.
- Werner
-- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, ICA, EPFL, CH werner.almesberger@ica.epfl.ch / /_IN_R_131__Tel_+41_21_693_6621__Fax_+41_21_693_6610_____________________/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/