Re: FS corruption... some help maybe??

Robert M. Hyatt (hyatt@cis.uab.edu)
Wed, 21 Jul 1999 13:06:28 -0500 (CDT)


On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Riley Williams wrote:

> >> When you leave these rare and necessary occasions away, what is
> >> left?
>
> >> Exact the situations, where NT falls over it's own bootstraps.
>
> > This is the problem. Win95/Win98/WinNT has to be rebooted a
> > dozen times just to install a new software package or piece of
> > hardware. And everyone gets used to the idea that changing
> > anything (dial-up networking, etc) means a "you must now reboot
> > windows for your changes to take effect."
>
> I remember seeing the following message somewhere, but can't think
> where...
>
> Q> Windows has detected that your mouse has moved. To implement
> Q> this change, it is necessary to reboot.
>
> Somebody PLEASE tell me that Windows isn't really THAT bad !!!
>

I think that is a slight exaggeration. However, if you "click" one
of the buttons, that is a different matter. :)

>
> Very true - uptime currently at 141 days on one of my systems, which
> is running kernel 2.2.2 quite happily...
>
> Best wishes from Riley.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/