> "Gregory T. Norris" <haphazard@socket.net> writes:
>
> > Are you using IPX, by any chance? If so, I've got a patch I can send
> > you which may take care of it...
>
> I might like to use IPX at some point, but right now I don't think
> it's implicated, since when I tried to stop the multicast packets by
> rebuilding the kernel without multicast support, I also turned off IPX
> (as well as APM, which Alan Cox pointed a finger at). I still saw
> some ethertype 8808 packets going out. But, I haven't verified that
> they were identical to the ones that toast the Cisco. For obvious
> reasons, we did it on an isolated test net consisting of my machine,
> the server & the sniffer.
Sooo, if ALan produces his proof tool you can try it against
your Cisco and see. I also have a stack of 1201 and 2900 Catalysts I
would like to do a trial by fire on.
----
First Law of System Requirements:
"Anything is possible if you don't know what you're talking about..."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/