Re: low priority soft RT?

yodaiken@chelm.cs.nmt.edu
Wed, 28 Jul 1999 17:23:59 -0600


On Wed, Jul 28, 1999 at 08:59:09PM +0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Unfortunately, that won't really do. We can, of course,
> just increase the range of nice levels, but all that does
> is increase the current "maximum deadlock time".

"maximum deadlock time" makes no sense. "delay" is the correct
word here.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/