Re: WARNING: GCC 2.9.5 & Linux

Patrick J. LoPresti (patl@cag.lcs.mit.edu)
03 Aug 1999 18:05:02 -0400


>>>>> "pcg" == Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com> writes:

pcg> There are basically two position:

pcg> - "fix" the compiler. to the gcc people this is unacceptable, as
pcg> it would need to be a documented gcc extension, and had to be
pcg> supported wlel into the future

Actually, they didn't seem too annoyed by the patch I sent them:

<http://gcc.cygnus.com/ml/gcc/1999-07/threads.html>

Search for "norestrict" and browse the discussion. (Yeah, it's long.)

To summarize, at least a few of the GCC people liked the concept,
although "__typealias" is a better name for it. I intend to clean up
the patch and submit it again after the 2.95 aftershocks die down.

- Pat

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/