RE: 2.2.11 and tulip.c issues

flippie (flippie@vwv.com)
Mon, 16 Aug 1999 09:11:09 +0200


I agree, the 0.91 driver is much better. I also had problems with 0.89.
When starting the machine, the driver gave a lot of errors with 0.89.
Running 2.2.7 and uptime of 38 days.

Flippie

On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > > Do we need to download Donald's 0.91 and test it or what?
> >
> > Try it - the more data we get (especially Don gets) the better
> > Alan
>
> some data:
>
> i had a problem with 0.89 where tulip wouldn't (apparently) start (ie no
> lights on hub) up after a rmmod/insmod or soft boot. I'd have to power off
> the machine to get tulip to work again or else insmod de4x5 which would work
> no matter what state tulip had left things in.
>
> tulip 0.91 doesn't have this problem. it always works.
>
> nic is an integrated DEC 21143 chip on a Samsung UX motherboard.
>
> regards,
>
> paul jakma.
> paul@clubi.ie
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
+---------------+-----------------------------------------+
| Flippie Spies | email: flippie@vwv.com                  |
|               | http://www.vwv.com                      |
| VWV Studios   | "I'm not afraid of dying, I just don't  |
| South Africa  |  want to be there when it happens."     |
+---------------+-----------------------------------------+

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/