Re: Kernel Panic, root fs..

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Tue, 17 Aug 1999 10:55:06 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Remco van 't Veer: ""Solved": fork problem (Re: fork or exec thingy.)"
Previous message: Netlink Webdesign: "unsuscribe"

On Tue, 17 Aug 1999, Glynn Clements wrote:
> IMO, the kernel doesn't need to be any more verbose. It already
> outputs sufficient information to diagnose the problem. Explanations
> belong in the documentation, not in the kernel itself.

If it was sufficient to diagnose the problem then why did they post to
linux-kernel to get the problem resolved.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Remco van 't Veer: ""Solved": fork problem (Re: fork or exec thingy.)"
Previous message: Netlink Webdesign: "unsuscribe"