Re: SCHE_RR/FIFO

Mogens Dybaek Christensen (dksinmdc@my-deja.com)
Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:34:08 GMT


Could the problem described in this thread be the same as the problem
with a nonosleep() loop under SCHED_FIFO I described in another posting
titled "Loop with nanosleep() (almost) monopolizes CPU"?

In article <7n3t5q$lkk$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
mourot@my-deja.com wrote:
> But It still remains a PB. The SCHED_RR pre-emption is based on 1s
time
> slice ( which seems to be a bug ).
> This prevents a Soft Real time process from using such a scheduling.
>
> Any thoughts ?
>

--
Mogens Dybaek Christensen,  mailto:mdc@dksin.dk
Adtranz Signal A/S, Denmark

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/