Re: [patch] possible SMP races all over the place in wait_event interface

Ingo Molnar (mingo@redhat.com)
Tue, 24 Aug 1999 10:34:44 -0400 (EDT)


On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, David S. Miller wrote:

> This 'merges' the barrier and the write. Or rather, in asm-i386 we could
> do something like:
>
> #define set_mb(addr,val) xchgl(addr,val)
>
> and then use set_barrier().
>
> Sure, but it costs ~8 instructions instead of 2 on ll/sc architectures.

i was not clear enough - this is why i said 'in i386-asm'. Other (saner)
architectures can use normal writes and sane barriers.

-- mingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/