Rudolf Leitgeb wrote:
...
> No we seem to be stuck in the "2.3.x is useless" stage and people cry for new
> features in 2.2.x again. Lots of people were ready to tinker around with 2.3,
> when they suddenly broke FAT and many other file systems. Then we had all kinds
> of horror messages of 2.3 kernels that suffered major instabilities here on
> lk-ml. As a result only true hackers and some newbies who didn't know better
> lay their hands on 2.3 kernels, but throrough real world testing only barely
> happens (I haven't read one article here on lk-ml where someone used 2.3.x on a
> big server. There was not one message so far about a DOS attack against 2.3.x
> kernels, IIRC.)
...
> Rudi
I am afraid that the major drawback that prevents people from using
2.3.x is the FAT breakage...
--------------5196B02BFD8B7DBB5FF1562A
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
name="manolow.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Manuel J. Galan
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="manolow.vcf"
begin:vcard
n:Galan Moreno;Manuel
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:E.T.S. de Arquitectura (ULPGC);Matematicas
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:manolow@step.es
x-mozilla-cpt:;1056
fn:Manuel Galan Moreno
end:vcard
--------------5196B02BFD8B7DBB5FF1562A--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/