Re: [2.3.15] pci_dev->rom_address ?

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com)
Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:14:24 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: mmap() better than read() fro streaming, Was: Re: Streaming disk I/O kills file buffering and ma"
Previous message: Jeff Merkey: "Re: Locks used in the FAT file system are non-atomic and in fact, don't work on SMP systems"
Maybe in reply to: Dr J Pelan: "[2.3.15] pci_dev->rom_address ?"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [2.3.15] pci_dev->rom_address ?"

Dr J Pelan wrote:
>
> Kernel 2.3.15
>
> include/linux/pci.h no longer defines "rom_address" in the structure
> "pci_dev". Some device drivers are still dependent it though;

pm2fb had this change in the last kernel:

s/rom_address/resource[PCI_ROM_RESOURCE].start/

Regards,

Jeff

-- "Nuclear war can ruin your whole compile." -- Karl Lehenbauer

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: mmap() better than read() fro streaming, Was: Re: Streaming disk I/O kills file buffering and ma"
Previous message: Jeff Merkey: "Re: Locks used in the FAT file system are non-atomic and in fact, don't work on SMP systems"
Maybe in reply to: Dr J Pelan: "[2.3.15] pci_dev->rom_address ?"
Next in thread: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [2.3.15] pci_dev->rom_address ?"