Re: RAID is a matter of availability, not data security
Bill Anderson (bill.anderson@libc.org)
Sat, 04 Sep 1999 14:11:32 -0600
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
>
> In article <cistron.37C2FF6D.57FC6B92@heliosam.fr>,
> Hubert Tonneau <hubert.tonneau@heliosam.fr> wrote:
> >So what I wanted to express is that if you say the new code is not perfect,
> >so we don't include it, it has to be balanced with the fact that not including
> >the code means ignoring hardware failures.
>
> Including new code in development kernels is fine, but not in maintenance
> releases of a stable kernel series if it is not backward compatible enough.
There are a great many of us using it in 2.2.x already. Rock solid from
my experience, in testing and production environments. Sounds pretty
'backward compatible' with the 2.2 kernel to me. or were you talking
about a different backwards compatibility?
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/