Re: SMP linux help

list.kernel@iahastie.clara.net
Sun, 5 Sep 1999 19:30:56 +0200 (CEST)


On Sun, 5 Sep 1999, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Actually the kernel lock is different to other spinlocks.
>
> When a task holding the kernel lock blocks, i.e. calls schedule(), the
> lock is dropped. When the task is run again, the lock is reacquired.

yes. The kernel lock can be best described as a 'spin-semaphore'. We might
want to change it to a real semaphore in the future, now that the locked
regions are getting much longer (multi-millisec). 2.5 stuff i guess.

-- mingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/