Re: 2.3.18ac8 doesn't detect tulip (again!)

Matti Aarnio (matti.aarnio@sonera.fi)
Wed, 22 Sep 1999 17:51:47 +0300


On Wed, Sep 22, 1999 at 03:18:43PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> It looks right. However its the wrong thing to fix.
> The device, vendor order is odd.
> Having it one way around for pci_id and the other for
> the subsystem is lunacy.
>
> I think the subsystem idea in the tulip driver should
> be flipped instead ?

How the chip->id.pci_mask and chip->id.subsystem_mask are made ?
And what are the values that are then compared.

This relates to the question of how those two variables must be
constructed.

> Alan

/Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@sonera.fi>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/