Re: [Q]: Linux and real device drivers

david parsons (o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s)
22 Sep 1999 19:32:02 -0700


In article <linux.kernel.d3zoyeej83.fsf@lxp03.cern.ch>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch> wrote:
>>>>>> "David" == David Hinds <dhinds@zen.stanford.edu> writes:

>David> The current big-kernel-tarball approach
>David> encourages kernel API drift (since some developers are
>David> indifferent or oblivious to the impact of changes on things
>David> that are not in the kernel tree) and version skew between what
>David> is in the kernel tree and what is in our driver development
>David> trees.
>
>API's have to change sometimes for various reasons, this is how the
>Linux kernel development model works. Fortunately Linus is not afraid
>of braking the API if some serious bug is found that cannot be fixed
>without breaking the old API.

Name one.

____
david parsons \bi/ Not overwhelming impressed with the ``it's too high
\/ performance to code properly'' argument.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/