Re: Why is chmod(2)?

Harald Koenig (koenig@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de)
Thu, 23 Sep 1999 15:23:14 +0200


On Sep 22, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
> > b. Is it possible?
>
> Yes if you define an `O_NONE' flag -- i.e. as opposed to O_RDONLY etc.
>
> All the problems with side effects due to open and lack of permissions
> are avoided by that: O_NONE means "return me a cookie, don't do anything
> else".

but you still have to mark that file being `opened' (in use),
or how do you avoid race conditions between open() and chmod() ?

Harald

-- 
All SCSI disks will from now on                     ___       _____
be required to send an email notice                0--,|    /OOOOOOO\
24 hours prior to complete hardware failure!      <_/  /  /OOOOOOOOOOO\
                                                    \  \/OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO\
                                                      \ OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO|//
Harald Koenig,                                         \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Inst.f.Theoret.Astrophysik                              //  /     \\  \
koenig@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de                     ^^^^^       ^^^^^

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/