Re: possible spinlock optimizations

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:48:49 +0200 (CEST)


On Tue, 28 Sep 1999, Chuck Lever wrote:

>besides, making the IRQ-masked spinlocks interruptible might mean that
>we're more likely to interrupt a deadlock via SysRq, right?

Yes.

Andrea

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/