Re: possible spinlock optimizations

Manfred (manfreds@colorfullife.com)
Wed, 29 Sep 1999 09:30:54 +0200

From: David S. Miller <davem@redhat.com>
> At least for the networking, page cache, and buffer cache in 2.3.18
> I think we get rather good scalability

I know this not belong into this thread, but afaik the page cache is
undersynchonized in 2.3.18:
Neither filp->f_pos nor inode->i_size nor O_APPEND are correctly
implemented.
Is someone working on this problem?

--
    Manfred








-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/