RE: SMP + RAID

Andre Hedrick (andre@suse.com)
Fri, 1 Oct 1999 20:31:57 -0700 (PDT)


This is not in ide.c

#if 0
if (hwif->irq != masked_irq)
disable_irq(hwif->irq);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwgroup->spinlock, *hwgroup_flags);
start_request(drive);
spin_lock_irqsave(&hwgroup->spinlock, *hwgroup_flags);
if (hwif->irq != masked_irq)
enable_irq(hwif->irq);
#else
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&hwgroup->spinlock, *hwgroup_flags);
if (hwif->irq != masked_irq)
disable_irq(hwif->irq);
start_request(drive);
if (hwif->irq != masked_irq)
enable_irq(hwif->irq);
spin_lock_irqsave(&hwgroup->spinlock, *hwgroup_flags);
#endif

Andre Hedrick
The Linux IDE guy

On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Tom Livingston wrote:

>
> Hi Andre,
>
> > I am building ide.2.2.12.19991001.patch now.
>
> I got the ide.2.2.12.19991001.patch and gave it a try. However, I noticed
> that the ide.c spinlock patch isn't included in this one (ie it isn't in
> 10-01, but it is 9-30). So the stock 10-01 is back to crashing for me. but
> if I apply the ide.c patch, all works well.
>
> Tom
>
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/