Re: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)

Stephen Frost (sfrost@ns.snowman.net)
Thu, 7 Oct 1999 18:59:53 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Horst von Brand wrote:

> Stephen Frost <sfrost@ns.snowman.net> said:
>
> [...]
>
> > The persistance that devfsd adds is, as I recall, less than elegant.
> > A better solution would be nice, almost like a special kind of symlink,
>
> ...that has to stay around just like files in /dev do right now, ...

Yes, this behavior would be an option, and would be to make others
happier about letting devfs be in the kernel..

Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/