Re: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Thu, 7 Oct 1999 17:17:39 -0700 (PDT)

On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Martin Dalecki wrote:
> Don't you just realize that all the twised symlinc blah blah proposals
> about devfs you are doing here are a sure sign of a basically bad design?

Im a devfs advocate but I agree the symlink design is bad.

Would an overmountable devfs address most of the arguments against it?

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/