|> What is wrong with just using the existing panic() from kernel.h?
|>
|> If there is information that panic() doesn't save which you would get with
|> an OOPS message, then that is a problem with panic.
A panic() is a point of no return. After an OOPS the kernel often can
continue after it has killed the offending task.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab "And now for something SuSE Labs completely different." schwab@suse.de SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/