Re: PUBLIC CHALLENGE: (was RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device

Stephen Frost (sfrost@ns.snowman.net)
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 18:26:23 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Matthew Dharm wrote:

> On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> > /dev can be cleaned up using rm(1). devfs at one point used tarballs
> > to handle permissions, now it doesn't, it uses a configuration file, which
> > makes it even more strange and un-filesystem like. I don't use a config file
> > to specify my permissions on my / partition.
>
> I hate to point this out... but if the objection is to configuration
> files, then what about /etc/fstab and the mount options that allow me to
> mount CD-ROM drives and MS-DOS/FAT32 partitions as various users with
> various permissions?
>
> The use of a config file to determine permissions/ownership is not foreign
> to the kernel or filesystems.

But it is to files inside a filesystem..

Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/