RE: devfs again, (was RE: USB device allocation)

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Fri, 8 Oct 1999 22:38:33 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David Ford: "Re: Dynamic Devices"
Previous message: Edward S. Marshall: "the devfs debate"

On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Either way, it's something that is not a real filesystem trying to
> pretend it is. The problem of permissions being associated w/
> files was dealt with quite a while ago and has worked for a rather
> long time, why try and invent a new way?

Try devfs before you criticize.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: David Ford: "Re: Dynamic Devices"
Previous message: Edward S. Marshall: "the devfs debate"