>> And I think they're bullshit, and they're NOT reasons
>> to exclude the devfs, they are only reasons for you
>> to not use it.
> How about instead of coming up w/ something that works for some
> people and makes them happy, we try and work on coming up w/ something to
> replace the current system (albiet this is much harder) that is acceptable
> to everyone.
This is great idea. Just one problem: devfs exists for almost TWO YEARS now.
I've seen A LOT OF complains. I've NOT SEEN any other code to solve the same
problems.
Discussion is always the same:
- We have problems: ... (read the devfs FAQ), here is solution.
- Your solution is non-acceptable.
- But what about problems ?
- You solution is non-acceptable, go away.
repeat 100 times...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/