Re: My $0.02 on devd and devfs

david parsons (orc@pell.portland.or.us)
13 Oct 1999 12:15:37 -0700


In article <linux.kernel.m3g0zftj78.fsf@sscnet.com>,
Benny Amorsen <bamorsen@netvision.dk> wrote:
>>>>>> "dp" == david parsons <orc@pell.portland.or.us> writes:
>
>dp> ``Modern'' is not the word I'd use for the standard
>dp> PC-style ports on an IBM PC clone.
>
>Then let us not redesign device handling in order to support a bus
>that is going away in a few years.

I think there may be a bit of confusion here. The PC-style ports
already exist, and Linux already handles them. If I build a modular
kernel (which I do), the current version of Linux will already do the
fbm needed to load the drivers and give me access. If I use a
devfs, current 2.3.x's will do the fbm needed to load the drivers and
give me access without any changes to userland. But if I use devd as
described in recent email on the kernel list, I either have to have
the device nodes already installed or I have to bloat my kernel with
the detection parts of the drivers or I have to build the drivers
into the kernel.

____
david parsons \bi/ ... to say nothing of the additional userspace daemon
\/ and the conversion table to convert from the new
guaranteed to be unusable without userspace massaging
kernel namespace to a namespace I can use. Shoot,
Redmond couldn't do better than that.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/