Re: Why is traffic shapper still in 2.3.x?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sat, 16 Oct 1999 20:05:04 +0100 (BST)

> Why is the traffic shapper still in 2.3.x? From my expirence, CBQ can do
> 10x more then TS can do (although it's not documented very well).
>
> Is there a reason to keep this code in any longer?
>
> Will it at least be removed after 2.4?

>From my point of view the real criteria for removing the shaper device is
a good document explaining how to set up the CBQ stuff to provide an
equivalent setup. Once there is a good guide to transferring from one to the
other then it is reasonable to drop shaper

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/