Re: 2.2.13 Sparc SMP Spinlocks...
Robert Dinse (nanook@eskimo.com)
Tue, 26 Oct 1999 06:30:59 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Robert Dinse wrote:
>
> > Am curious what you are doing on that machine.. I've had good luck with
> > machines sitting idle, this is about a 1 million hit/day web server. I would
> > suspect you would have something fairly heavy duty to justify that much RAM.
> > Also curious what CPU's you have in that SS-20, maybe is CPU specific (i.e.,
> > fine with TI sucks with Ross or something along those lines). If all I have to
> > do to make this thing stable is replace SS-10 with SS-20 chassis I'd do it!
>
> Hehe, actually, at the moment it isn't doing anything, though I'd be
> more than happy to do just about anything to it. It's more-or-less my playtoy
> for a little while, we're testing having Linux running on a Sparc. The CPU's
> are TI's, 60mhz. Also there is only two of them. Have any thoughts on
> something I could use to generate a similar load to what you have to see if
> that makes a difference?
>
> Stephen
I know there are test suites out there for beating on web servers but I am
not familiar with any of them. Since I don't know exactly what it is that
triggers this I don't know exactly what the best way to replicate it other than
in service traffic would be.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/