Re: Bogus serialP.h patch?

Jamie Lokier (lkd@tantalophile.demon.co.uk)
Wed, 3 Nov 1999 22:40:26 +0100


Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> Well, the whole name "serial.c" is part of the problem; perhaps we would
> have been better off calling it "ns8250.c". But as you know, that's
> also part of the historical baggage.

And, btw, it collides with the *other* serial.c: the USB one.

It's unfortunate to have two modules called serial.o...

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/