Re: vfork

Sean Hunter (sean@uncarved.co.uk)
Mon, 15 Nov 1999 10:28:18 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Sid Boyce: "RE: [OT] Solution to StarOffice problem, and general WinXX compatibility."
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: memory info broken"
In reply to: Urban Widmark: "Re: smbfs: "rm -rf" dircache problems"

On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 06:18:25PM -0500, Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> Anyway, this is a silly and horrid argument. If you can't say
> something nice about vfork(), don't say anything at all.

How nice the kernel list would become if you took your own advice in
this regard...

Sean

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Sid Boyce: "RE: [OT] Solution to StarOffice problem, and general WinXX compatibility."
Previous message: Ingo Molnar: "Re: memory info broken"
In reply to: Urban Widmark: "Re: smbfs: "rm -rf" dircache problems"