> Most likely 2.4 will keep compatibility symlinks, but even that is not
> guaranteed. If k3wl krapplications will break - too bad for them.
That's the first time I've ever heard free(1) called `k3wl'.
> FWIC
> the rest is fair game.
Certain bits, like /proc/meminfo, pretty much need compatibility
symlinks.
> Again, it _will_ change.
We're nicking /kern from FreeBSD? :)
-- `If both of these are true, Unix98 ptys are fully operational, and ready to destroy unarmed planets.' --- Richard Gooch- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/