Re: dual pIII network / lockup problems

Arjan van de Ven (arjan@fenrus.demon.nl)
Thu, 25 Nov 1999 18:37:40 +0100 (CET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [Patch] shm bug introduced with pagecache in 2.3.11"
Previous message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: inode_lock "decorative"?"

In article <E11r2Y6-00081a-00@the-village.bc.nu> you wrote:
> I build 2.2.x with every driver I don't have as a module before I even release
> it. Arjan van de Ven runs random choice compile sequences and contributes
> patches to the odd ones that fail. You might want to ask Arjan for his
> randomiser and load test your PIII boxes with it.

Currently, I don't test (symbols from) modules. If this would be
appreciated, I believe I can extend my scripts to test for this as well.

Greetings,
Arjan van de Ven

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Andrea Arcangeli: "Re: [Patch] shm bug introduced with pagecache in 2.3.11"
Previous message: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru: "Re: inode_lock "decorative"?"