Re: spin_unlock optimization(i386)

Ingo Molnar (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Fri, 26 Nov 1999 20:26:56 +0100 (CET)


> ./causal 0 2

forgot to mention that if you do:

./causal 0 1

then we get the previous 'simple' [one cpu stores, another loads]
testcase, which doesnt fail, as expected. [I hope the code is simple
enough to have no bugs, but i cannot guarantee it ;)]

-- mingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/