Re: [patch] new spinlock variant, spinlock-2.3.30-A4

Ingo Molnar (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Wed, 1 Dec 1999 01:18:03 +0100 (CET)


On Wed, 1 Dec 1999, Davide Libenzi wrote:

> I agree with Bret here.
> I can see the Mingo code only a fast entry lockless test , ex :

like i said, it's a fast lockless spinlock. Only the slowpath is affected
by the complexity mentioned before. Whenever we got serious contention on
any spinlock then the solution was not to start worrying about the slow
path, but rather splitting up that spinlock to reduce contention.

-- mingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/