|> Ok, good but now I ask you the same thing I was asked when I made my patch
|> - how about m68k? I.e. "while you are at it, why not move the
|> unlock_kernel() to the same place as on other archs". Or does anyone know
|> why m68k is special?
Linux/m68k just does not care, because we don't have SMP yet (and probably
never will). unlock_kernel is a no-op on UP.
Andreas.
-- Andreas Schwab "And now for something SuSE Labs completely different." schwab@suse.de SuSE GmbH, Schanzäckerstr. 10, D-90443 Nürnberg- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/