Re: Portable binary modules

Tim Waugh (twaugh@redhat.com)
Thu, 2 Dec 1999 17:13:08 +0000 (GMT)


On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Jim Nance wrote:

> Is it as easy as having the UP kernels provide dummy locking functions
> which always say they aquired a lock but dont really try?

Then you get the hit of a function call instead of a no-op on UP.

Tim.
*/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/