Re: lowlatency-2.2.13-A1 questions
William Montgomery (william@opinicus.com)
Thu, 2 Dec 1999 15:44:55 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 2 Dec 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yep - 2.3 already has the fix:
>
> int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> struct task_struct *tsk;
>
> tsk = cpu_curr(this_cpu);
> if (preemption_goodness(tsk, p, this_cpu) > 0)
> tsk->need_resched = 1;
>
Thanks - works great now!
I am now only getting +/-1msec scheduling jitter on a heavily
loaded system. I am not using the console on the system so
I expect thats why I havent seen any latency problems there.
Can the console changes from the lowlatency-2.2.10-N6B.patch
be applied to 2.2.13 with fixups for rejects or is it more
involved than that?
Wm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/